Conclusion & Summary        In the first page, I set out to show that the truth of non-physical statements could not influence anybody. Therefore from a practical standpoint no non-physical statement is of any significance to how anybody will choose nor what anybody will believe. The reason I show this is because many terms, usually philosophical, are used in a non-physical way. I go on to provide common examples in the philosophy section of this site.        The second page shows how logic handles physical-statements, particularly physical philosophical statements. I make a focus on ethics because through ethics we can approach one of the topics considered most socially important today: politics. My conclusion isn't universally accepted yet; many people think that definitions logically influence conclusions and decisions. And my conclusions certainly aren't implemented (see the politics section).        The third page wraps up ethics and gives the general guideline for any statement to be relevant to a logical individual.